Establishing Zion

Land stands at the center of the Abrahamic covenant, and the way a community relates to land reveals what it actually believes about ownership, stewardship, and identity. Two archetypes run through this chapter in sharp contrast. The first is the person who defines himself through possession — Gerald O'Hara declaiming that land is the only thing that matters, Pahom measuring out his fatal acres until the effort kills him. The second is Naboth, who refuses to sell his inherited vineyard to King Ahab not because he is greedy but because the land is covenant identity, not commodity. For Naboth, the vineyard is not an asset to be maximized. It is his family's inheritance, his place in the covenant community, his connection to ancestors and descendants. Selling it would be a betrayal not of market value but of covenant relationship.

​

The Savior reiterates the land covenant four emphatic times in 3 Nephi. This repetition is not accidental. The gathering of Israel to specific covenant lands is not a metaphor or a historical curiosity. It is an active, ongoing promise with direct implications for how covenant people should understand their relationship to place, to property, and to the communities they inhabit. The land covenant means that Latter-day Saints are not spiritual nomads — people who could live anywhere and it would make no difference. They are a gathered people, covenanted to specific places, with obligations that flow from that covenanting.

​

Against the dominant modern framework of fee simple ownership — in which property is essentially an unrestricted right to use, exclude, and transfer — the chapter develops a stewardship theology drawn from D&C 104 and the parables of the talents and the unjust steward. The key insight is captured in the parable of the unjust steward: using things as though not owning them, holding surplus in trust for those in need, and understanding that the master will eventually require an accounting. Fee simple ownership says: this is mine to do with as I please. Stewardship says: this has been entrusted to me, I am accountable for how I use it, and surplus belongs to the master's purposes rather than to my own accumulation.

​

The George Goates story is the chapter's most affecting illustration of stewardship in practice. When a neighboring family was struck by a series of tragedies during harvest season, Goates and his sons quietly harvested the neighbor's crops alongside their own — anonymously, without being asked, and at real cost to themselves. When the neighbor discovered what had happened, he found not just his crops harvested but a note explaining that the Goates family considered themselves stewards of whatever they had been given, and that surplus time and labor belonged to those in need. That is stewardship theology lived rather than preached.

​

Property rights in Zion will function differently from either of the two dominant Western frameworks — the bundle of sticks approach, which treats property as a collection of separable rights to be traded and recombined, and the ownership model, which treats property as a unified right of dominion. In Zion, property rights will function as permanent covenant inheritances carrying inherent social obligations. They will not be fee simple assets to be bought and sold without regard to community impact. They will be stewardships — entrusted to specific families and communities, held in ways that serve the broader good, and passed on in ways that preserve covenant identity across generations.

​

The practical implications for how Zion communities should approach land use, development, and transfer are significant. Community land trusts, covenant deed restrictions, cooperative ownership structures, and inheritance practices that preserve family land across generations are all instruments that reflect stewardship theology rather than fee simple ideology. None of these is exotic. All of them are operating in communities around the world today. The question, again, is whether covenant people are willing to pursue them with the intentionality and patience that building Zion requires.